@TheTwistedGypsy Your retarded dude. I recomend stop smoking pot and getting a job. Nuclear IS the best source of power. Go bother the fossil fuel guys! there the ones fuckin shit up.
@shittalker911 A Hemp based manufacturing society. Decentralization of manufacturing, Home power generation capable. And now here’s my TinFoil hat solution…..Release ALL OF TESLA’S PATENTS, and we can have FREE energy. But you stay in the dirty little radioactive” Box” with your solutions.
@TheTwistedGypsy I would! at least itll create more work environment for my town and i could stay local for somethin i wouldnt mind as a career! And I’ll be laughing when the plant is producing 106 megawatts(1 megawatt = 1,000,000watts) of power with no cost besides having to be next to a lake or ocean and having to put up with the steam out of the towers! Hope you can find better power, Wind cant generate 1/8th of that without destroying acres of land and destroying habitat =) Any argument?
@shittalker911 what ever…..but your time to weight ratio is plucked from your ass. You like them so much , then petition your community to have one built there, or make application for your community to be a Nuclear Waste repository. And it can your community’s responsibility for 50.000 fuk’n years…
@TheTwistedGypsy I repect your views but modern science says it takes 75 years to create 2lbs of nuclear waste from fully used elements. And that 2lbs is small enough to fit in a coke can. I heard a rumor that there coming up with ways to recycle it and all melt downs that ive seen were human error, thanks but im all for nuclear
I REPEAT FIFTY THOUSAND MUTHA FUK”N YEARS……..50,000 YEARS….50,000 YEARS…50,000 YEARS….50,000 YEARS…get it through your thick skull ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO DO!
@TheTwistedGypsy Also, Propaganda? Im basing this off of my own experience, not ones of others. Im basing this off of what i believe is right and what should happen and would happen. Also, i know youll bring up the fact of environment when i say that storing them underground is a good idea. The fact is that most people are misslead like yourself to believe that they just burry it in the ground. People just dont understand that the word Nuclear can be a good thing.
@TheTwistedGypsy I personnaly see no problem with storing them underground. Its not going to harm the environment, and transportation of them is very safe. They dont just put the fuel rods into a hole and cover it up. They put them in containers that can withstand the pressures of the ground if the tunnels were to collapse. The only problem is that it takes up space. But the idea of having it all in one area is a good idea. And no one can use them because there “spent” fuel rods.
@FlashProduktions are you still yappin……its not the plants that are the real danger. Its the waste…there is no way to contain it for 50,000 years….as my first comment here stated “Nuclear Waste….Giving A.I.D.’s To The Earth…One Reactor At A Time….”
keep to my point and take your propaganda bullshit and save it for the fluoride coma cases….SHILL….PS YOUR WORDS “If one happens, the other will probably cancel the other out…..now just fuk off dillhole….
@TheTwistedGypsy Ive already told you the chances of an accident happening. Stop trying to Bull shit me in anyway you can. I said probably because theres still a chance, But ive already told you how low it is. If i didntsay probably, you would of have been an ass about it and say that theres still a chance.
@TheTwistedGypsy And, incase you dont understand how unlikly it is, ill tell you even more. Like i said, about .1% chance of a problem by people, and the same for tech error. If one happens, the other will probably cancel the other out. So infact its not .1% chance overall. Its like having to get a number between 1 and 1000 two times in a row! Thats the same chances of a wind turbine have a blade fly off and kill a crowd of 200+ people at a parade! Plants are safe as can be!
@TheTwistedGypsy Also, No nuclear disaster has happened in over 20 years. There havent even been that many small problems. The chances of a nuclear power plant exploding is the same chance as: Being selected 5 times in a row out of all the people on earth. Its not possible! Reactors are designed so that even if an accident happened, it would CONTAIN it. It would have to be that 1 in a trillion explosion for that to happen. Go learn about this before you post BS here!
@TheTwistedGypsy First of all, if you read my comment or if you knew a thing about math, you would know that its a smaller chance then .1%. Also, ive studied chernobyl for years you dumbass. Chernobyl was caused by low trained personnel and they ended up shuting down safety equipment. That would never happen in any reactor today. Also, Earth movements would not cause an explosion, nor would it damage the plant to a point of radiation release. You have no clue what your talking about!
@FlashProduktions WHAT?….um…Chernobyl ring a bell….um earth movements that will easily blow open any containment we can think of,,,,ummm its a deadly thing for 50,000 years…..grow up shill….only an idiot or a nuke propagandist would make the claims you are….it only takes that .01% to fuk us all…oh yea…how bout all the drums of nuke waste the russians dropped into the sea…think there gunna stay intact for 50,00 years..I repeat your an idiot or a nuke propagandist .
@TheTwistedGypsy You have no clue what your talking about. Nuclear power does not affect the Environment at all. The only way it could would be if there was an accident. Theres a 99.99% chance that nothing bad will happen at a nuclear plant because of humans. Theres a 99.99% chance that nothing will go wrong because of the tech. If one does have a problem, the other will cancel it out, unless your pretty god damn unlucky! I could calculate the final chance, but im to lazy to waiste that time.
Page 3 of a 2009 MIT study says nuclear power costs 8.4 cents per kilowatt hour. That is very high. Much higher than the 2 cents per kilowatt hour figure that proponents of nuclear power often give. The study is available at footnote 42 of the wikipedia article “the Economics of Nuclear Power.”
better yet, before you respond to me, study economics, sociology, anthropology and epistemology, then let me know what you think. don’t mean to seem like a dick but youtube’s comment section is way to inconvenient a forum to go through this with you people over and over.
Take a look at countries where the state is nearly gone where there are free markets because people like to exchange things freely – this form of government is called anarcho-capitalism. Some good examples are the wild west, Somalia and Haiti. It’s not my lifestyle.
So you would agree that borders, visas, passports, etc. are really states meddling with the free market of labor, right?
Do you see states controlling wage inflation as meddling in the free market? How about controlling unions? Do you think employees get a fair shake when negotiating their wages? Do you think unions get a fair shake when negotiating wages? Why are unions hated by capitalists?
Anarcho-capitalism is much more arcane than socialism. Take a close look at Somalia and Haiti. These are good examples where there is little government and an unregulated market.
@shittalker911 suck my gay neighbors dick shill, when the fuk did you think anyone cares what the fuk you think ….
@TheTwistedGypsy Your retarded dude. I recomend stop smoking pot and getting a job. Nuclear IS the best source of power. Go bother the fossil fuel guys! there the ones fuckin shit up.
@shittalker911 A Hemp based manufacturing society. Decentralization of manufacturing, Home power generation capable. And now here’s my TinFoil hat solution…..Release ALL OF TESLA’S PATENTS, and we can have FREE energy. But you stay in the dirty little radioactive” Box” with your solutions.
@TheTwistedGypsy I would! at least itll create more work environment for my town and i could stay local for somethin i wouldnt mind as a career! And I’ll be laughing when the plant is producing 106 megawatts(1 megawatt = 1,000,000watts) of power with no cost besides having to be next to a lake or ocean and having to put up with the steam out of the towers! Hope you can find better power, Wind cant generate 1/8th of that without destroying acres of land and destroying habitat =) Any argument?
@shittalker911 what ever…..but your time to weight ratio is plucked from your ass. You like them so much , then petition your community to have one built there, or make application for your community to be a Nuclear Waste repository. And it can your community’s responsibility for 50.000 fuk’n years…
@TheTwistedGypsy I repect your views but modern science says it takes 75 years to create 2lbs of nuclear waste from fully used elements. And that 2lbs is small enough to fit in a coke can. I heard a rumor that there coming up with ways to recycle it and all melt downs that ive seen were human error, thanks but im all for nuclear
I REPEAT FIFTY THOUSAND MUTHA FUK”N YEARS……..50,000 YEARS….50,000 YEARS…50,000 YEARS….50,000 YEARS…get it through your thick skull ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO DO!
@TheTwistedGypsy Also, Propaganda? Im basing this off of my own experience, not ones of others. Im basing this off of what i believe is right and what should happen and would happen. Also, i know youll bring up the fact of environment when i say that storing them underground is a good idea. The fact is that most people are misslead like yourself to believe that they just burry it in the ground. People just dont understand that the word Nuclear can be a good thing.
@TheTwistedGypsy I personnaly see no problem with storing them underground. Its not going to harm the environment, and transportation of them is very safe. They dont just put the fuel rods into a hole and cover it up. They put them in containers that can withstand the pressures of the ground if the tunnels were to collapse. The only problem is that it takes up space. But the idea of having it all in one area is a good idea. And no one can use them because there “spent” fuel rods.
@FlashProduktions are you still yappin……its not the plants that are the real danger. Its the waste…there is no way to contain it for 50,000 years….as my first comment here stated “Nuclear Waste….Giving A.I.D.’s To The Earth…One Reactor At A Time….”
keep to my point and take your propaganda bullshit and save it for the fluoride coma cases….SHILL….PS YOUR WORDS “If one happens, the other will probably cancel the other out…..now just fuk off dillhole….
@TheTwistedGypsy Ive already told you the chances of an accident happening. Stop trying to Bull shit me in anyway you can. I said probably because theres still a chance, But ive already told you how low it is. If i didntsay probably, you would of have been an ass about it and say that theres still a chance.
@FlashProduktions well maybe you are comfortable tying the future of man to a “probably” but I’m not……..
@TheTwistedGypsy And, incase you dont understand how unlikly it is, ill tell you even more. Like i said, about .1% chance of a problem by people, and the same for tech error. If one happens, the other will probably cancel the other out. So infact its not .1% chance overall. Its like having to get a number between 1 and 1000 two times in a row! Thats the same chances of a wind turbine have a blade fly off and kill a crowd of 200+ people at a parade! Plants are safe as can be!
@TheTwistedGypsy Also, No nuclear disaster has happened in over 20 years. There havent even been that many small problems. The chances of a nuclear power plant exploding is the same chance as: Being selected 5 times in a row out of all the people on earth. Its not possible! Reactors are designed so that even if an accident happened, it would CONTAIN it. It would have to be that 1 in a trillion explosion for that to happen. Go learn about this before you post BS here!
@TheTwistedGypsy First of all, if you read my comment or if you knew a thing about math, you would know that its a smaller chance then .1%. Also, ive studied chernobyl for years you dumbass. Chernobyl was caused by low trained personnel and they ended up shuting down safety equipment. That would never happen in any reactor today. Also, Earth movements would not cause an explosion, nor would it damage the plant to a point of radiation release. You have no clue what your talking about!
@FlashProduktions WHAT?….um…Chernobyl ring a bell….um earth movements that will easily blow open any containment we can think of,,,,ummm its a deadly thing for 50,000 years…..grow up shill….only an idiot or a nuke propagandist would make the claims you are….it only takes that .01% to fuk us all…oh yea…how bout all the drums of nuke waste the russians dropped into the sea…think there gunna stay intact for 50,00 years..I repeat your an idiot or a nuke propagandist .
@TheTwistedGypsy You have no clue what your talking about. Nuclear power does not affect the Environment at all. The only way it could would be if there was an accident. Theres a 99.99% chance that nothing bad will happen at a nuclear plant because of humans. Theres a 99.99% chance that nothing will go wrong because of the tech. If one does have a problem, the other will cancel it out, unless your pretty god damn unlucky! I could calculate the final chance, but im to lazy to waiste that time.
Nuclear Waste….Giving A.I.D.’s To The Earth…One Reactor At A Time….
Page 3 of a 2009 MIT study says nuclear power costs 8.4 cents per kilowatt hour. That is very high. Much higher than the 2 cents per kilowatt hour figure that proponents of nuclear power often give. The study is available at footnote 42 of the wikipedia article “the Economics of Nuclear Power.”
@yurom BBC World Service covered this report 2 weeks ago… look it up on their website.
better yet, before you respond to me, study economics, sociology, anthropology and epistemology, then let me know what you think. don’t mean to seem like a dick but youtube’s comment section is way to inconvenient a forum to go through this with you people over and over.
TRNN,
I am still waiting for your report on the assassination of the top Iranian nuclear physicist by Western Intelligence agents.
Take a look at countries where the state is nearly gone where there are free markets because people like to exchange things freely – this form of government is called anarcho-capitalism. Some good examples are the wild west, Somalia and Haiti. It’s not my lifestyle.
So you would agree that borders, visas, passports, etc. are really states meddling with the free market of labor, right?
Do you see states controlling wage inflation as meddling in the free market? How about controlling unions? Do you think employees get a fair shake when negotiating their wages? Do you think unions get a fair shake when negotiating wages? Why are unions hated by capitalists?
Anarcho-capitalism is much more arcane than socialism. Take a close look at Somalia and Haiti. These are good examples where there is little government and an unregulated market.