Thinkfree Presents: The Deceptions Demise – ‘with lawful excuse’ 1/5
Freeman-on-the-land Robert-Arthur: Menard. 2007 Seminar Ontario, Canada Focus is on Student Loans and Using a Claim of Right as a lawful excuse. ThinkFREE is dedicated to helping achieve a freer and more just society, where authority is achieved without deception and exercised with restraint, understanding, accountability and compassion. We employ educational seminars, guerrilla videography, Notarial justice, advocacy, public action and dance. (Seriously, never doubt the power of dance) Recognizing that justice is truth in action, we champion not only human rights but human dignity and firmly believe there is more than enough for everybody. Using the power of truth and simple questions we shine a light on those who seek to deceive and subjugate and once identified, we do not shy from the duty to peacefully and lawfully correct. This video is distributed with permission from Freeman Robert-Arthur: Menard Peace and prosperity to all! www.thinkfree.ca
|
@2012nugget
lmfao at grammar nazis on youtube!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111
Does any of this or any of his stuff apply to the States? Is it essentially the same idea or is there someone else teaching this stuff for the states?
February 5 2010=6,977 views
It’s not the lottery. You don’t claim any cash. All you do is become the agency for the debtor in your name.
Oct. 1/2009 – 6068 views
is this the same as the united kingdom and if so how do i go about claiming my cash!!!
5,816 views 03 September 2009
How does that work in the USA?
Do you have to be a freeman/strawman to do this, or can anybody discharge debt?
I like the idea of creating a record of the view count. I’ve seen counts on Ron Paul and John Harris (UK) videos drop down massively overnight, which could be attributed to a glitch, but to suspicious old me it looks more like an attempt to present the impression of little popular interest. In the case of Ron Paul, it dropped from over a million to about 15 thousand overnight.
Thank you Robert Menard, you are a Peaceful Warrior for the New Earth
watching the view count – 4029
It is like we have a big thief around but can’t quite ever catch him doing anything. The big banks belong to Wallstreet and Wallstreet belongs to the Rothschilds.
The Rothschilds have central government banks in almost every country and-think about this-A rich man and a poor man both buy stocks and the stocks go up-the rich man takes his money out and leaves the poorman with worthless stock-that is the Rothschilds and that is who the bailout is going to-which they don’t even need!
2714 views Jan 23.09
Rob. wow, you have given me much to think about and research, keep up the good work, I too will become a free man on the land, enough is enough, time to empower myself
)
Again, big thanks to Rob! The next time I travel on the road, it will be with a de-registered, insured(gotta figure out surety bonds), and safe, conveyance.
I’ve been studying and committing Rob’s videos to memory for the past year. Also been reading through definitions in the Law dictionary as of recently, and have accidentally pissed off a friend who works for the CRS (revenue) merely by asking for his opinion on these vids. : If you read this P, don’t be mad!
Vic Beck is fun… but his sovereignty may be limited.
Simply communicate better 2012nugget,
“Hence , he’s in it for the money ?”
It is bad grammar…it’s an assumption he’s in it for the money cause he sell’s packages of his work.
Is it not nice to be compensated for the work and effort one does?
“He who distinguishes well, learns well”.
Peace eh!
How hard was that ? <
You responded to a question with an answer .
Got milk ? Got milk .
Peace
Everything in the packages can be found on the web for free.
Is he in it for the money?
Could he be in it for the money?
English 101.
Peace eh.
I noticed in the video he stated he had “packages” to deal with certain topics .
Hence , he’s in it for the money ?
Again there is a question mark due to the fact that I do not know , A question mark again is just that , sorry you put your own meaning to my question .
Make a statement and put a squiggle after it, then try and say it is in fact a question when the statement speaks for itself.
I and everyone reading this can see your statement is not a question, and as you call it an insult to my intelligence.
Make comment about the video without personal attacks..
or
Bugger off.
Again a question mark is just that , a mark to distinguish between a comment or a question . I am truely sorry you do not recognize the difference . That along with the school boy insults gives insite to your level of intelligence .
Peace.
Do you wish to examine your response? That is a question.
he’s in it for the buck ? is a statement not a question.
It’s like me saying:
‘You’re a Dick?’
Do you see the capital ‘D’ in Dick?…and the question mark.
Peace.
Wow , have you ever tried to comprehend what you read ?
Let me try again….he’s in it for the buck ?
Notice the question mark , which indicates that as a question , not a slanderous comment .
As for the ass part , well … seems you should know who’s making an ass of themselves .
So you know Robert do you! You know his intentions?
or
Are you making an ass out of yourself…..
Do some research before slandering anyone…